One thing leads to another. How do you get from the Daily Poem in the Paris Review to a re-read of The Loved One and an exploding portable toilet courtesy of Evelyn Waugh?

Here’s the Annmarie Drury poem that caught my attention:

Walking in Hills of Which One Has Seen Many Paintings

Your task differs: to leave
the world to its own particular
fragility: not to turn it to emblems the way

shadows of cows in a pond once
became emblems of the heat
of a summer day. Within borders of your

vision, imperfect frame, the sun
sets, shadows are allowed
to darken away. Others knew this landscape,

but you know there must
always be those who only watch
and, watching, wander off; while quietly,

quietly even the most suggestive
fragility undertakes its own slow
transformation, cedes to its own complexity.

“Not Ideas About the Thing But the Thing Itself”

So things are seen on a walk, in life, are the things themselves – not a sign, a symbol, an image, representation or emblem of something else. As the things themselves. Wallace Stevens put it this way; “Not Ideas About the Thing But the Thing Itself”. 

Is it possible to disconnect what we see from our ideas about what we see and from the things (art for example that have created those meanings and associations? Like the paintings of cows in a pond signaling the heat of summer. It’s every country walk through a cow pasture in summer with the cows seeking shade by a stream or pond, their tails flicking the flies, and the ground slick with cow pats. Careful! Don’t worry about your shoes. Don’t slip!

Emile van Marcke de Lummen (1827-1890) Bathing cows

Drury’s poem ends with the knowledge that others have been here before us. They walked the landscape and saw the sunset and gave it meaning.

Sunset

It was Paul Fussell who put me onto sunsets. In The Great War and Modern Memory, he comments on how the literary tradition of the Romantics and the Victorians had imbued the sunset with meaning and significance,

The experience of living in the trenches of the Western Front and the ritual of stand-to at the beginning and the end of the day established a new awareness of sunrise and sunset.

What one stared at twice daily for years on end, thus, was sunrise and sunset. “We have a unique opportunity of viewing sunrise and sunset in the trenches,” writes Hugh Quigley, “owing to the decree that men must stand-to at daybreak and nightfall.” And if Flanders was flat and wet, it had the distinction of offering terrain and weather productive of superb dawns and dusks. “I have never seen such glorious vistas of sunset or sunrise as in this country,”

Paul Nash, We Are Making a New World,1918  Imperial War Museum

It was a cruel reversal that sunrise and sunset, established by over a century of Romantic poetry and painting as the tokens of hope and peace and rural charm, should now be exactly the moments of heightened ritual anxiety. What literate young man could forget, during the hour of stand-to, the sunrises of Blake and Shelley, of Tennyson and Arnold, the sunsets of Wordsworth and Byron and Browning, and even of Sir Henry Newbolt? Those attentive to the history of taste know that sky awareness is a fairly late development. There is little of it, for example, in the eighteenth century, which felt no pressing need for such emblems of infinity as sky or sea.

Paul Nash, Bomber in the Corn 1940 Tate Gallery

As we can see from the Nash paintings, sunrise and sunset lend meaning to our perceptions of the scenes. The hopeful optimism of the title (We are Making a New World) is rendered ironic by the scene of utter desolation of a ruined lifeless landscape. The sun is rising on what exactly? The huge red watery sunset contributes melancholy to the Totes Meer (Dead Sea) graveyard of the downed plane. 

In Fussell’s view, the key document in the history of British awareness of the sky is the influential five volumes of John Ruskin’s Modern Painters (1843-1860).

Here Ruskin asserts that hitherto no one has paid sufficient attention to the sky, and that we have thus missed much of what Nature has to tell us for our moral benefit. The effects of the sky, he says, are “intended” by their “Maker and Doer” for our pleasure as well as our moral instruction. The sky speaks universally to the human heart, “soothing it and purifying it from its dross and dust.” And the great exponent of the sky’s moral work is the painter J. M. W. Turner. His renderings of sunrise and sunset are far superior to those of Claude Lorraine, and for Ruskin the painter of such effects is a master artist whose achievements in light and color imitate those of God himself in His most earnest pedagogic moments.

J.M.W.Turner Sunset 1830-5, Tate Gallery

We had some spectacular sunsets when we lived in Duchess County. Here’s one magnificent example from November 2015.

Modem Painters was immensely influential in establishing the visual taste of the Victorians and their successors. Charlotte Bronte wrote of it: “This book seems to give me eyes,” and she was followed by several generations uniquely devoted to observing sunrise and sunset with an almost mystical enthusiasm.

As Fussell notes – the literature of WW1 is stuffed with sunrises and sunsets.

Emphasized as objects of close attention by the daily rituals of stand-to, sanctified as morally meaningful by the long tradition of Ruskin, these sunrises and sunsets, already a staple of prewar Georgian poetry and the literature of the Celtic “Twilight,” move to the very center of English poetry of the Great War. They are its constant atmosphere and its special symbolic method.

We are the Dead. Short days ago
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved and were loved, and now we lie,
In Flanders fields.
– from In Flanders Fields by John McCrae
A Revolting Sunset
But – things move on. in 1889 Oscar Wilde was already getting sniffy about sunset worship.
Yesterday evening Mrs. Arundel insisted on my going to the window and looking at the glorious sky, as she called it. Of course I had to look at it. She is one of those absurdly pretty Philistines to whom one can deny nothing. .\nd what was it? It was simply a very second-rate Turner, a Turner of a bad period, with all the painter’s worst faults exaggerated and overemphasized – (The Day of Living).
By 1930 so much had been made of sunrises and sunsets that the sophisticated, cynical, and dyspeptic such as Evelyn Waugh were sick of them. This is from his travel book Labels:
I do not think I shall ever forget the sight of Etna at sunset; the mountain almost invisible in a blur of pastel grey, glowing on the top and then repeat¬ ing its shape, as though reflected, in a wisp of grey smoke, with the whole horizon behind radiant with pink light, fading gently into a grey pastel sky. Nothing I have ever seen in art or Nature was quite so revolting.
Feral Children
And so we arrive at Waugh who wrote some of the most deliciously malicious lines in literature. Waugh is the kind of author whose books would need multiple trigger warnings to protect the modern-day marginalised and vulnerable who might come across them at university.
Take his description of the feral brood of evacuee children in Put Out More Flags
It’s early in WW2 and our unscrupulous hero – Basil Seal – becomes involved with his sister’s role as evacuating officer. There’s a set of Birmingham evacuees – the Connolly children – that nobody wants.  The oldest,  Doris, is “ripely pubescent, aged by her own varied accounts anything from ten years to eighteen. An early and ingenious attempt to have her certified as an adult was frustrated by an inspecting doctor who put her at about fifteen.” Then came “Micky, her junior by the length of a rather stiff sentence for house-breaking, was of lighter build; a scrawny, scowling little boy; a child of few words and those, for the most part, foul.”  and to top off the trio – the potty un trained and incontinent Marlene.

Marlene was presumed to be a year younger. But for Micky’s violent denials she might have been taken for his twin. She was the offspring of unusually prolonged coincident periods of liberty in the lives of her parents which the sociologist must deplore, for Marlene was simple. An appeal to have her certified imbecile was disallowed by the same inspecting doctor, who expressed an opinion that country life might work wonders with the child.

There the three had stood, on the eve of the war, in Malfrey Parish Hall, one leering, one lowering, and one drooling, as unprepossessing a family as could be found in the kingdom.

Our hero finds an ingenious way to manage the family while making a handsome profit.  This is not the finest hour of the British Blitz spirit, but classic Waugh. He was not of the #BeKind brigade.

It’s also very much in the spirit of the set of evacuee playing cards produced at the same time featuring some very unflattering of evacuees. It reflects the well-documented culture shock of the meeting between the middle class of the English shires and the urban poor.

Imagine creating such a set of cards. Imagine playing with them.

And to add to the fun Waugh gave his evacuees the surname Connelly, not an accidental choice. Waugh made a habit of teasing and tweaking his friend and literary rival Cyril Connelly. It’s almost a running joke of his novels. In Black Mischief (1932) there is a General Connolly an Irish mercenary and former gamekeeper who has scandalously married a native of the African nation of Azania.  Men at Arms (1952) has a comic set piece involving an exploding portable toilet on the inside lid of which was embossed ‘Connolly’s Chemical Closet’. 

For a full detailed accounting of Waugh’s war on Connelly read Duncan McLaren  

The Loved One begins with a funny scene that mentions the “out-dated” Horizon – the literary magazine that Connolly founded in 1940.

Waugh had visited California in early 1947 and become fascinated with the extravaganza of the Forest Lawn cemetery and its mortuary practices. 

He asked if  Connolly would publish it as a special but regular edition of Horizon. Connolly agreed,  and so the book appeared in February 1948.

The first edition of the book came with illustrations by Peter Boyle who took detailed instructions from Waugh on what the they should show.  As McLaren points out the ridiculing of Connolly continued in the prose (the character Sir Francis the Hollywood ex-pat and  Mr Joyboy the embalmer) and the illustrations.  

As chance has it the latest Times Literary Supplement has a review of a new edition of The Loved One. This Oxford University Press edition, edited by Adrian Poole comes at the bargain price of  £130 (US $170)

This edition is part of OUP’s Complete Works of Evelyn Waugh and comes with all the reverential minutiae required by the true Waughian scholar. It also has the original set of illustrations by Stuart Boyle.

Raw Anarchy and Independent Systems 

The review concluded with these words from Waugh from 1946:

I have come to the conclusion that there is no such thing as normality. That is
what makes story-telling such an absorbing task, the attempt to reduce to order the anarchic raw
materials of life. The artist’s only service to the disintegrated society of today is to create little
independent systems of order of his own.

JosieHolford

View Comments

  • As ever a walloping read neigh gallop through the apparently unconnected memories of our own minds...own individual minds. I read last night a book from The School of Life. The Romantics sure have lot to answer for in influencing how we rate our relationships. How disappointing a "love" or a sunset can be if we are told how either should be. It messes with our perceptions of what is desirable. Question is.. do we each secretly know.. and yet dare not say?

  • funnily enough I was remembering this morning the first time I was impressed by a sunset. I was 12/13 and as far as I can remember no one had ever drawn my attention to such spectacles. I was in catholic boarding school and the nuns released us from our homework to view it yet I don't remember that I regarded it as a religious experience. I just found it very pleasing and still do, likewise a spectacular dawn.
    I enjoyed reading about Feral children. I can't imagine what it would be like to suddenly have city children foisted on me though I hope I would have treated them better than too many were. Why must we be protected from reading about what was? Don't I recall that the truth shall set us free?

  • Thank you for reminding me about Evelyn Waugh ! I was a great enthusiast for his work about 40 years ago . Now I remember why - but also why I have not read him since !

    • Know what you mean. He's the perfect combination of the delightful and the rebarbative. Some of the best and worst of Waugh's wit, wisdom, and venom it's hard to beat his correspondence with people like Nancy Mitford where both vent their spleen with vicious abandon.

Recent Posts

A Bonfire in the Dark

When I was in the emergency room last year having busted my elbow, a nurse…

1 week ago

Locked Out

Most of us have done it at some point or another - accidentally locked ourselves…

2 weeks ago

The #1970 Club: Germaine Greer and The Female Eunuch

Thanks to the #1970 Club, I've spent the spare moments of the past week immersed…

4 weeks ago

The Forgetful Mog

Thanks to the #1970 Club,  I have a new mog in my life and a…

1 month ago

The #1970 Club: Language and Learning

The #1970 Club is starting tomorrow (October 14th) and I'm prepared with some reading and…

1 month ago

How do they live with themselves?

How Do They Live with Themselves? This was the question Roger Rosenblatt asked in The…

1 month ago