I share two resources in case they may be helpful in conversations with children about tragic events. The first is from Mister Rogers whose wise advice was “Look for the helpers”.
My second resource is the five points from the psychologist Rob Evans written in response to 9/11. They have relevance now. I wrote to him then asking his permission to quote them. I am assuming that his permission to share still stands:
- It is helpful not to over-assume what the tragedy means to children. They react differently depending on their age, their closeness to the situation, their own personalities, what they hear and are told, and their family’s pattern of communication. Some may be deeply moved, others less so. Some may have many questions, others fewer. Not all will be intensely affected. Showing little reaction does not automatically mean a student is hiding or denying his or her feelings.
- Young people are remarkably resilient. They may become quite upset, but given a chance to express what they feel, they usually resume their normal lives–and often do so more rapidly than we adults. Tragic deaths can actually hit adults harder than they do teenagers or young children. Most young people do not benefit from extensive, probing adult-led questioning about their reactions. They do profit from simple, direct information and from adults being available to respond to their questions and to listen.
- If you receive difficult questions from children it can be useful to understand these before answering them. Often a request for information is spurred not only by curiosity, but by a feeling. Usually, the child already has some idea about this. We may be more helpful if, rather than plunging into an immediate answer, we learn what motivates the question. This is particularly true if the question is a difficult one. Parents can say, “What made you think of that?” or “Can you tell me what you were thinking about?” Also, it can be good to ask “What ideas do you have?” Once you know the meaning of the question, it is easier to answer effectively.
- There may be questions we cannot answer, which can make us feel inadequate. But children and teenagers are typically more comforted by straight talk than by false assurances. Rather than to invent a response, it can be much more helpful to say, “I don’t know,” or, “I’ll try to find out.”
- Coping with a tragedy is not primarily a matter of technique, not something best handled by a “strategy” that deviates sharply from a family’s or a school’s familiar patterns of communication. The routines of school, for example, are all by themselves a source of comforting continuity and assurance. Parents and teachers both will rarely go wrong by relying on what is most basic between them and children–caring and connection. At these times, even if everyone feels deeply upset, your presence–your simply being with them, their knowing that you are available–will be reassuring.
View Comments
Thank you so much for posting this. What a wise and wonderful man Fred Rogers was. And the advice for talking with children is so helpful. So often we rush in when it would be much better just to be with children and listen first and take our cues from them.