Books, RattleBag and Rhubarb

Wilt and the #1976Club

Together with a whole lot of other readers in the UK in 1976, I read Wilt – the first in a series of over-the-top, grotesque Tom Sharpe novels about the misadventures of a mild-mannered and hapless tech college teacher named Henry Wilt. He’s a rather fuddy-duddy, decent-enough, beer-drinking, everyman kind of chap given to being misunderstood, especially by his wife and the local Fenland constabulary. #1976Club

Wilt’s job is to bring culture to day-release apprentices variously grouped in classes such as Meat 1 and Gasfitters 2.  Needless to say, they are impervious to the pleasures of Mill on the Floss but always ready to defend capital punishment, give gays a bashing, and expel immigrants.

“The man who said the pen was mightier than the sword ought to have tried reading The Mill on the Floss to Motor Mechanics.” – Wilt

Wilt’s been passed over for promotion again and Eva has fallen in with Sally Pringsheim whose husband Gaskell is a visiting professor from 1970’s Californication. Gaskell is into plastic and at a swinging party at the Pringsheim’s, Wilt has an unfortunate encounter with a large blow-up sex doll. (He resists Sally’s voracious sexual appetite and she gets her revenge by wedging him into a compromising position with the doll).

Over-the-top chaos and mayhem ensue leading Wilt to fantasize about murdering his wife. In an ill-conceived and gin-soaked escapade, he rehearses the disposal of the body using the doll as a substitute.  When Eva disappears (she’s with the Pringsheims on a boat on the Broads) Wilt becomes the prime murder suspect of the bumbling, incompetent – soon-to-be embittered – Inspector Flint.

And then there’s college politics – always good for a send-up – and a naked Eva hiding in the shrubbery of a drunken vicar.

The number of choirboys indecently assaulted annually by vicars and church-wardens may lead you to suppose that England is a deeply religious country.” – from Wilt’s lecture to Advanced Foreigners on Liberal and Progressive Attitudes from 1688 to 1978. The Wilt Alternative (1979) 

Policemen, vicars, college administrators, Americans (all varieties), politicians, teachers, students – pretty much anyone actually – are fair game in Sharpe’s anarchic world of Wilt. He’s an equal opportunity satirist with a special edge in sexism and misogyny.

By the time of the second book, Wilt – emerging victorious from his humiliations – is chair of the department, living in an upscale house and with four quadruplet girls. At age four they are precocious and trouble. At fourteen they are lethal. But I get ahead of myself. This is The Wilt Alternative (1979) and Eva is into ecological improvements and the alternative lifestyle.

Humour is idiosyncratic. What has some people falling about laughing can leave others asking: “What’s funny about that?’ And so it is with the Wilt books. When a drunken Wilt pees in a garden hedge and has an unfortunate encounter with a rose bush it’s mildly funny. Ditto endless other misadventures involving his penis – in a tooth mug, at the local hospital, and during a lecture on British Culture at USAF Baconheath.

But give me a terrorist scenario with diabolical children, self-detonating beer bottles, an imperious old woman, bewildered revolutionaries, and a malfunctioning compost toilet – now that has potential. It helps that the children have gorged themselves on a freezer full of homemade ice cream and organically grown apples, the woman has been sampling the brew, and Wilt is coming to the rescue.

In The Wilt Alternative, Eva’s latest enthusiasm includes an organic toilet and methane conversion. Wilt is brewing his own beer and they are the parents of four-year-old quadruple girls.  For some reason, (no need to ask why – the plot is absurd) terrorists have confined the quads and their babysitting ex-colonial neighbor – a Mrs. De Frakas – in the cellar. Imperiously,  she has little regard for the terrorists. She is the widow of  Major-General deFrakas (DSO), grew up in India, and knows just how to deal with small children and unruly underlings. Her voice had a “distinctly firm ring to it—or as Wilt had once put it, if at eighty-two she could no longer break a sherry glass at fifty paces she could still make a guard dog whimper at forty.”

Mrs de Frakas likes children and – being rather deaf – thinks the Wilt quads delightful, an opinion that was shared by no one else in the district.  But the situation wears even her down to great comic effect involving the urgent needs of the quads, drunkenness, and an exploding compost toilet.  All of which disorients the terrorists allowing their capture by the police. 

‘Shits in shits’ clothing,’ muttered Professor Maerlis, gazing in awe at the human excreta that stumbled about the lawn. (p.212)

At one point Wilt inserts himself into the siege and is communicating as an alternative terrorist cell (again – no need to ask why) and shows an alarming ability to mouth off revolutionary rhetoric. He is well versed in the language having managed bolshie, middle-class militants on the teaching staff.

Strictly speaking, only the first Wilt book is #1976Club eligible. But I read all of them last week and each tends to blur into the next.

  • The Wilt Alternative (1979)
  • Wilt on High (1984)
  • Wilt in Nowhere (2004)
  • The Wilt Inheritance (2010)

obscene
  gross exaggeration
     cartoonish characters
        absurd plots
           grotesque situations
               in extremely bad taste
                  over-the-top misogyny and sexist stereotypes
                     smutty seaside postcards turned into novels
                        foul-mouthed fiction
                           the worst so-called British humor
                             excessively offensive
                                Benny Hill level crossed with Donald McGill
                                   batshit crazy
                                     deranged vulgarity
                                        wildly offensive
                                           crude in the extreme
                                              tasteless
                                                garish and crude
                                                  demented

And – sometimes – so funny that I couldn’t control my laughter.

And there you have it.

I think I have to re-read his take on literary critics and criticism – The Great Pursuit – next. See if that holds up. 

The featured image is from a satirical print at the Science Museum Group

This print depicts the failed balloon launch from the gardens of Lord Foley’s house in Portland Place, London, in September 1784. The balloon’s enormous shape is exaggerated to resemble a human bottom from which flames erupt and smoke billows. A much smaller balloon appears to shoot out of the fire, in the form of a grinning head with ass’s ears wearing a jester’s cap lettered ‘THE ENGLISH BALLOON 1784’. Spectators watch from the ground and the garden wall as people attempt to bring the situation under control. Lettered underneath the image ‘Caelum ipsum petimus Stultitia’ [‘In our foolishness, we reach for the sky itself’], from Horace, Odes 1.3. Designed and etched by Paul Sandby, probably London, 1784.

#1936Club, 1956Club

Tagged , , , ,

18 thoughts on “Wilt and the #1976Club

    1. Odd? Yes. And invariably over-the-top grotesque and equal opportunity offensive. I’ve just finished re-reading all the Wilts plus “The Great Pursuit”, “Porterhouse Blue” and “Ancestral Vices”. Of those I think Wilt is the one to start with. He at least is a sympathetic figure – a kind of hapless anti-hero who combines a certain nostalgia for the way things were with his desire to murder or at least escape from his immediate family of Eva and the four lethal offspring. Hard done by, put-upon, badgered, humiliated and misunderstood Wilt would really like to live in a tool shed on an allotment. If the reader can read identify with Wilt and not be distressed by Sharpe’s obsessions with large women, and sexual permutations and paraphernalia then …. The other novels have no such redeeming character. They are all in varying degrees repulsive and grotesque. And some of the scenes in the Wilts are truly funny.

  1. Hilarious review. I’d forgotten about Tom Sharpe but used to enjoy his books all those years ago. I think he went off the boil as time went on. I’m looking forward to your account of The Great Pursuit.

  2. I wonder what Miss Wildman would have made of Wilt. I don’t think I would ever have been covering Tom Sharpe’s books in clear sticky back plastic for the Headlands Library. Still, there enough decent books in it to keep me going until I could convince the Town Library I was old enough to use an adult ticket. Do you remember the esteemed Harold Joliffe, whose name was inside every book. I always consider myself so lucky to have those libraries available for free. To me the adult Town Library was an awesome place, seemingly full of delight and knowledge.

    I discovered Sharpe later in life and always love to read him. My favourite is Porterhouse Blue but I always had a feeling it could have been filed in the Non Fiction section.

    1. Miss Wildman would not have approved them for library purchase. And one can only imagine Magson’s apoplectic distress that such lavatorial filth would even be printed. But I do remember that library and haunted it on many a long dinner time. They used to sell off the out-of-date magazines and periodicals and I remember buying the London Illustrated News and one year The Elizabethan – an earnest magazine aimed at teenagers but that generally missed the mark.

      Loved the town library too and yes – it was good to finally graduate to the adult section where there were books on interesting and risque topics such as juvenile delinquency plus all the mysteries and thrillers of Agatha Christie, Ngaio Marsh, Hammond Innes et al.

      Back to Miss Wildman for a moment – what a wonderful gift to a school she must have been with her energy and enthusiasm that ran the library, founded the Film Society, and was there for every dramatic production for decades. All in addition to teaching English. I recently read in an old Adver article that when she retired she ran the Oxfam Shop on Faringdon Road.

      Thanks for writing Michael.

  3. You have true stamina Josie and to understand even a little of British humour is a huge achievement for any non native. To be honest, it’s a huge achievement for native Britons!

    1. I’m actually a native Brit. Merely transplanted across the Atlantic. And reading the whole Wilt oeuvre was quite painless. Except for the very occasional outburst of uncontrollable laughter.

      It’s got me thinking about what it means to have a sense of humor and how one person’s joke is another person’s offensive remark and so on.

      But – even leaving politics aside – is someone slipping on a banana skin funny?

      I tend to say no. Misfortunes are not funny. (Unless said person has just demonstrated crass insensitivity to the pratfalls and mishaps of others. In which case it becomes an hilarious skewering of pomposity and hypocrisy.)

      Curious now about the funniest – or just funny book folks have read.

      Do you have a favorite funny book Peter?

      1. What a difficult thing to pin down. I rather enjoy clever funny such as Stephen Fry and also off the wall funny such as HHGTTG. I do have what some find to be a peculiar sense of humour and it is probably very puerile with toilet humour featuring often. I have been known to break down in uncontrollable hysterics but need the right person to join in! I’ve been fortunate to find many right persons throughout the years.

  4. In ’76 I was already in the US and not exactly laughing. Maybe these books would have helped. I’ll have to get hold of one. I can never tell anymore what will make me laugh!

    1. They are all available free to borrow at the online Open Library. Makes for a financially risk-free experiment. I will be interested in what you think.

      Americans do not do well in Tom Sharpe books. Well nobody does really except our everyman anti-hero Wilt who manages to emerge somewhat triumphant from each outrageous misadventure. And he picks the most extreme stereotypes to lampoon.

    1. You either find him funny or you don’t. And if you find him funny (or rather – when you find him funny – a lot misses the mark for me) then it is a matter of uncontrollable laughter. You can get books on tape. I think Stephen Fry is one of the Wilt readers.

Comment. Your thoughts welcome.